For the most part, a very interesting debate, well worth the time to view it. I did think the question should have been divided and devoted solely to the second half, "gender identity is no substitute for sex in social policy.” That is, of course, exactly the program of the Department of Education and the recently promulgated revision of the regs for Title IX, to substitute the Gnostic mysticism of gender identity for the material reality of sex.
For the most part, a very interesting debate, well worth the time to view it. I did think the question should have been divided and devoted solely to the second half, "gender identity is no substitute for sex in social policy.” That is, of course, exactly the program of the Department of Education and the recently promulgated revision of the regs for Title IX, to substitute the Gnostic mysticism of gender identity for the material reality of sex.