I appreciate what you do, but it's foolish to use snark like "Admiral Lupron" when reporting on this. That is not going to make your work more credible to people who need persuasion.
i disagree. gender ideology's success in obtaining widespread support is primarily due to a decades long PR and lobby campaign, including misleading catch phrases, inaccurate innuendo and blanket lying. Using a term like Admiral Lupron? aint no thang but a chicken wing. plus at least its truthful. which makes it 10000x better than the mantas and slogans of the religious supporters of gender ideology.
many people "marry early". meaning the first framing of an issue they become familiar with is what they stick with for life, even if its completely inaccurate. that's been one of the key's promoters of gender ideology's success - they framed the issues in terms of their own sci fi narrative before many were familiar with the issues. that allowed activists and big biz to frame the issues as per their fictional narative, even though that narrative is 1000% based on lies. every gender biz stat and claim is a lie. you cant name one thats not. but that doesnt mater to the religious nuts who believe in the gender ideology religion
I have only started to review the documents, but already I can see that this is an outstanding, and very professional, piece of work. Clearly, a lot of knowledge, hard work, and dedication went into producing these documents. I extend my applause and grateful thanks to all involved. (I do agree with others who have recommended leaving out Levine’s nickname, as unfortunately, I think it will undercut the otherwise sober, serious nature of this effort.)
The message gets lost when "Admiral Lupron" and baiting language is used to deal with such a serious issue. It brings the reporting on these findings down to a NYPost-scandal-sheet level, negating any important information by covering it with snark and personal feelings. Though it may feel good to the writer to see their "clever" personal outrage in print, it's a great way to lose people and dilute any message. Please treat this issue with the seriousness it deserves.
I understand that he has an administration post. Thousands of individual have those. And there are dozens of assistant secretaries. Is it the claim that every action that these appointees do goes all the way to the White House? If that’s the case, the claim becomes meaningless.
If there were in fact direct White House involvement, say a communication from one of Biden’s aides, I would consider that to go all the way to the White House. But how would I distinguish that from circumstances where there is no communication?
yes, the Admiral has an Administration post. hes federal HHS assistant secretary. but he has been given a blank check to erase the rights of women, kids, ppl with psych issues, gays and others who are harmed by his promotion of gender ideology
I appreciate what you do, but it's foolish to use snark like "Admiral Lupron" when reporting on this. That is not going to make your work more credible to people who need persuasion.
i disagree. gender ideology's success in obtaining widespread support is primarily due to a decades long PR and lobby campaign, including misleading catch phrases, inaccurate innuendo and blanket lying. Using a term like Admiral Lupron? aint no thang but a chicken wing. plus at least its truthful. which makes it 10000x better than the mantas and slogans of the religious supporters of gender ideology.
Is it better to call him by preferred name and she/her pronouns and support the ruse?
I'm not seeing "Admiral Lupron" anywhere. Where is that term used?
The authors removed it and noted this somewhere in another comment.
Yeah, either way, you’ll probably or persuade us.
many people "marry early". meaning the first framing of an issue they become familiar with is what they stick with for life, even if its completely inaccurate. that's been one of the key's promoters of gender ideology's success - they framed the issues in terms of their own sci fi narrative before many were familiar with the issues. that allowed activists and big biz to frame the issues as per their fictional narative, even though that narrative is 1000% based on lies. every gender biz stat and claim is a lie. you cant name one thats not. but that doesnt mater to the religious nuts who believe in the gender ideology religion
I have only started to review the documents, but already I can see that this is an outstanding, and very professional, piece of work. Clearly, a lot of knowledge, hard work, and dedication went into producing these documents. I extend my applause and grateful thanks to all involved. (I do agree with others who have recommended leaving out Levine’s nickname, as unfortunately, I think it will undercut the otherwise sober, serious nature of this effort.)
The message gets lost when "Admiral Lupron" and baiting language is used to deal with such a serious issue. It brings the reporting on these findings down to a NYPost-scandal-sheet level, negating any important information by covering it with snark and personal feelings. Though it may feel good to the writer to see their "clever" personal outrage in print, it's a great way to lose people and dilute any message. Please treat this issue with the seriousness it deserves.
i understand what you mean . and your view deserves respect. but in my opinion. its ok to say Admiral Lupron
I understand that he has an administration post. Thousands of individual have those. And there are dozens of assistant secretaries. Is it the claim that every action that these appointees do goes all the way to the White House? If that’s the case, the claim becomes meaningless.
If there were in fact direct White House involvement, say a communication from one of Biden’s aides, I would consider that to go all the way to the White House. But how would I distinguish that from circumstances where there is no communication?
Do you mean Admiral Levine?
Yeah, that dude.
Corrected
Thanks
"Admiral Lupron" Perfect!
I don’t see the evidence that this goes “all the way to the White House.” Is there a White House official who is implicated?
yes, the Admiral has an Administration post. hes federal HHS assistant secretary. but he has been given a blank check to erase the rights of women, kids, ppl with psych issues, gays and others who are harmed by his promotion of gender ideology
See below for my reply.
There’s a typo on the left side. “To” should be “the”.